Daily Writing March 5th

What are some of the responsibilities that you have as an evaluator of the proposals written in response to the NOFO you have just released? What are some of the implications of the decisions you make? How can you demonstrate to all the stakeholders--community partners, teachers, university committees, and your colleagues on the SPBs--how seriously you take this responsibility?

The responsibilities are that we must read each proposal and judge whether we will be considering it or not. We will be comparing the different proposals to find which one will be most effective. I will demonstrate how seriously i take this responsibility by completing each task with determination and drive.

Now, reflect on the qualities of effective evaluative writing that are important to evaluating the forthcoming proposals--clearly defined and explained criteria; comparisons based on the criteria; evidence that supports claims; evaluation of visual elements—in terms of how you will report out your evaluations of each of the proposals your SBP receives. Look at the above qualities and the criteria from your evaluation rubric and write a bullet-point list of key qualities that you will use to evaluate the proposals you receive.

-Do they clearly define their mission statement
-How does their mission statement compare to others
-Do they have evidence such as statistics
-How do visual elements support their claim